David Stevenson's blog



Interesting Things

  • Be careful when extending classes from structs. Their superclasses are essentially anonymous classes, so reopening them can be difficult. If you attempt to reopen them by extending them from "the same" struct, it will actually be a different anonymous class.
  • Ever had an STI model but wanted the views and controllers to pretend like it all extended the base class? You can have rails change the params[] namespace that it uses like so:

    form_for :user, @admin_user, :url => user_path(@admin_user)

Or you can be super-cool and use polymorphic routes:

form_for @admin_user.becomes(User)

The becomes method is part of ActiveRecord, and it actually creates a 2nd copy of the object with the same attributes and a different class (shallow copy). Due to this implementation, it has limitations so use it carefully.

  • Upgrading to rails 2.3.3 breaks HopToad. This is related to filter_parameter_logging, and it's technically rails' fault. It has been fixed in 2.3.3 stable (which I assume will be released as 2.3.4). You can also fix it yourself with a one-line-patch. Personally, I'd wait to upgrade till 2.3.4 comes out.

David StevensonDavid Stevenson
iPhone Interface for Pivotal Tracker
edit Posted by David Stevenson on Thursday March 19, 2009 at 04:59PM

I've been wanting to use Pivotal Tracker on my iPhone, so I wrote a little proof of concept using the Tracker API. I thought that a native application would be much more difficult than a skinned web application using ActiveResource.

I tried out Dashcode, Apple's recommended iPhone-compatible front-end web development tool, but was disappointed. I basically found myself developing the entire application in javascript, actually using XMLHttpRequest to talk directly to the API. This would have been pretty neat if I could have pulled it off, but I'd rather develop a data-heavy application in rails than javascript.

I ended up using simple CSS to skin the application called UiUI. It's the best looking iphone UI I've seen, with tons of elements to choose from. It's missing effects, of course, being only CSS. I also used Heroku, a free and scalable rails deployment environment to host my application. With it, I was up and running with a functional tracker application in under 3 hours. Since then, I've added the ability to create and update stories.

Check it out, let me know what you think: http://itracker.heroku.com

If you're not on an iPhone, be sure to use Safari. It doesn't look great in Firefox or IE.

David StevensonDavid Stevenson
Standup for 2/3/2009: Enemerable#sum vs ActiveRecord#sum
edit Posted by David Stevenson on Tuesday February 03, 2009 at 05:17PM

Interesting Things

  • When you call user.purchases.sum(), you are invoking ActiveRecord::ClassMethods#sum rather than Enumerable#sum. If you want to invoke Enumerable#sum (which takes a block and is more powerful though less performant), you'd have to call user.purchases.target.sum() {|p| p.price * p.quantity}.
  • NewRelic sometimes makes our app servers malfunction. Several of us reported having these sorts of problems on different projects. It's always fixed by the NewRelic team with a new version or a configuration change, but we wish that we felt safer about our production server stability. Some projects feel that the value is certainly worth it, and Engineyard uses NewRelic data when discussing scaling, so it's worth hanging in there.

Ask for Help

  • What's the deal with using the OSX terminal and bash/readline messing with the terminal? We're always typing some ridiculously long command and bash starts writing over itself. Especially when we use Ctrl+A and Ctrl+R and edit the line. Anyone know how we can stop/fix this once it happeneds?

David StevensonDavid Stevenson
Standup 2/2/2009: Rails 2.3 is gonna be sweet
edit Posted by David Stevenson on Monday February 02, 2009 at 05:18PM

Interesting Things

  • Neat Plugin: Caio Chassot suggested a patch to rails that makes rails template finder traverse the controller inheritance chain when looking for templates. This would make the view system work "correctly" with inheritance, which one of our projects needed. The patch wasn't applied, but the code was released as a plugin called inheritable_templates, which we are now using and enjoying.
  • What's the opposite of {:a => 1, :b => 2}.to_a? It's Hash[:a, 1, :b, 2].
  • Rails 2.3 is going to be awesome! We're most looking forward to
    • Nested model assignment and views
    • Nested transactions, even on MySQL!
    • Default Scopes, no more adding :order => "position" on every acts_as_list model
    • Smarter rendering of partials
    • Rack support
    • Bringing of Engines back. Pivotal is still going to support Desert at this time. Desert is similar to engines, but loads every class that matches in the load path, not just the first one. This allows you to build plugins that extend previous plugins. Using engines, however, we are hoping to make the source code for desert even more trivial.

In order to accomplish some advanced search functionality, we've added a lot of named_scopes to our User model. This seems like a good idea, and well within the intended use for named_scopes. Unfortunately, we ran into issues with our :joins. We have a separate User and Profile model, but our advanced search scopes often needed both to make decisions. So we had some scopes that look like this:

class User
  named_scope :verified {
    :conditions => {:email_verified => true}
  }

  named_scope :answered_questions {
    :join => "INNER JOIN profiles ON profiles.user_id = users.id " +
                 "INNER JOIN answers ON answers.profile_id = profiles.id"
  }

  named_scope :with_name { lambda { |name| 
    :join => "INNER JOIN profiles ON profiles.user_id = users.id",
    :conditions => ["profiles.name LIKE ?", "%#{name}%"]
  } }
end

Using these named_scopes, we wanted to dynamically construct a finder that would return the results the user was interested, such as: User.verified or User.answered_questions or even User.verified.answered_questions.with_name('Joseph'). The last scope caused issues, unfortunately, with table aliasing. The query ended up joining in the profiles table twice, in exactly the same way without renaming the table, so mysql rejects the query.

The easiest solution to this problem was to use only the hash form for :join clauses, such as :join => :profile. Rails correctly merges multiple consecutive join scopes that use hashes. If you need to use string joins (such as a LEFT JOIN rather than an INNER JOIN) or put a condition directly on your join, then merging goes out the window and the hashed form is immediately converted to a string and all consecutive joins are "merged" by appending them together.

We started by manually aliasing our scopes, but in some cases we were concerned about the amount of duplicate data this was causing in our queries.

We thought about creating a dependency framework for named_scopes, such that you could have a single :profile scope that other scopes were dependent on and it would only ever get added once. This seemed really difficult because of the way the with_scopes are constructed by named_scopes, there was no good place to keep track of these dependencies, and it would still cause problems if you had a manual with_scope, or :join in your find.

Finally we decided that rails fundamentally lacked the capability to deal with duplicate joins, and that we should solve this problem. It seemed a good solution was to allow :join options to take an array of strings as follows:

  named_scope :answered_questions {
    :join => ["INNER JOIN profiles ON profiles.user_id = users.id",
                 "INNER JOIN answers ON answers.profile_id = profiles.id"]
  }

Now calling User.answered_questions.with_name('Joseph') will create three values in a :join array, two of which are identical and will be uniq'd out. The downside to this approach is that each value in the :join array has to be string identical, or it will not be properly uniq'd.

So if you are mixing hash style :profile joins with string joins of the same table you need to be careful you match the rails generated syntax. We mostly use string style joins to avoid this issue.

Here's the ticket the we filed and patched: 1077-chaining-scopes-with-duplicate-joins-causes-alias-problem

It has been commited and will roll out with rails 2.2. Since then we have filed two more issues related to :join and :include:

We hope to patch these two as well!

Joseph & David