We all like a good oxymoron, like redefining constants. There are times where we need to redefine a constant to test an edge case in the application code. Before I go into this example, please note that redefining constants is generally not a good way to have maintainable software. If you find yourself needing to redefine a constant, it may be an indication that refactoring is needed.
Given that, lets get into an example where you may need to redefine a constant. Lets say an app has does file uploads to Amazon’s S3 service. A common practice to upload to a real S3 account made for the production, development, or demo environment.
When in the test environment, a fake S3 service would be used instead. The fake service is useful to keep your tests fast and running predictably.
To get a different File Upload service object in each of your environments, one can have the S3 configuration in the environment files:
STORAGE_SERVICE = FakeStorageService.new
STORAGE_SERVICE = S3StorageService.new("development_service", "access_key", "secret_access_key")
STORAGE_SERVICE = S3StorageService.new("production_service", "access_key", "secret_access_key")
The File Upload service objects can be set to constants in the environment file. This works great when testing the logic of the objects that use the File Upload service. However it is a good idea to run an integration test that does a real upload.
Since the tests are running in the test environment, a fake File Upload service is being used. Well now we want to use a real service that points to a test S3 account. An easy trick is to redefine the constant to the S3 service in setup and then redefine the constant back to the fake service on teardown.
There are a few ways of doing this…
Just Reset the Constant
context "A real S3 call" do setup do STORAGE_SERVICE = S3StorageService.new("test_service", "access_key", "secret_access_key") end teardown do STORAGE_SERVICE = FakeStorageService.new end end
This is the simplest approach, but it produces an error:
warning: already initialized constant STORAGE_SERVICE
context "A real S3 call" do setup do silence_warnings do STORAGE_SERVICE = S3StorageService.new("test_service", "access_key", "secret_access_key") end end teardown do silence_warnings do STORAGE_SERVICE = FakeStorageService.new end end end
This solution removes the warning, but now a certain section of your code will not have warning at all. Also, one could argue that you lose semantic meaning. It also feels like a hack.
Redefine the Constant
class Module def redefine_const(name, value) __send__(:remove_const, name) if const_defined?(name) const_set(name, value) end end context "A real S3 call" do setup do Object.redefine_const( :STORAGE_SERVICE, S3StorageService.new("test_service", "access_key", "secret_access_key") ) end teardown do Object.redefine_const( :STORAGE_SERVICE, STORAGE_SERVICE = FakeStorageService.new ) end end
Calling redefining the constant does not generate a warning. Also it does provide semantic value because you are actively declaring that you are redefining the constant. If there are other warnings, you will also see them.
Its all Dirty
Redefining constants is a non-standard tatic, especially for those new to Ruby. Since this is unconventional and is often contrary to assumptions, it may lead to unpredictable behavior.
Maybe the storage service can be an attribute that can be changed for individual tests.