You might call this post Part 2 in a component based architecture series. The first post describes a solution for better organizing loosely-coupled, highly-cohesive components within a singe Rails application.buy ultram online
This post describes a component based solution that aims to support vastly different user experiences and client side strategies across multiple web applications that share a common domain while allowing developers to work independently within individual web applications or components.buy diazepam online without prescription
Here’s the scenario…valium online no prescription
You’re tasked with building a fairly large web application, several user roles each packed with handfuls of high-level activities. The larger application could clearly be broken apart into smaller web applications. It’s a clear win to break things down. The smaller applications would have unique responsibilities and developers could work within the context of one application without worrying about introducing breaking changes across applications. However, the smaller applications, although independent, share a common domain or database.buy tramadol without prescription
You start thinking about how you’d expose subsets of the domain as RESTful services and maybe introduce a single sign-on approach, although you’re concerned about managing, versioning, and deploying multiple web applications and services, not to mention how this might impact the early development rhythm. There’s no clear path to success, so you write the classic uber app.soma online no prescription
The tide could be changing in your direction. Here’s a solution that’s shown early success for developing and deploying large Rails applications: move loosely-coupled, highly-cohesive web applications and components to a components directory within a container Rails project.provigil online pharmacy
Until recently such an approach might be difficult to imagine. Although, with the addition of mountable engines in the latest versions of Rails, the approach is now possible. Here’s an example that describes the project structure…adipex online without prescription
ativan online no prescription
container_rails_app/ app config components/ component_1/ lib/component_1.rb lib/component_1 test/lib test/test_helper.rb Gemfile component_1.gemspec Rakefile component_2/ component_3/ web_app_1/ app config test/lib test/test_helper.rb Gemfile Rakefile web_app_2/ app config ... ...
The container application simply mounts dependent web applications as Engines, exposing each with their own context or url. Engines in turn reference in any Engines or Gems they depend on.buy ambien without prescription
However, there is one twist, we keep everything in a single Git repository.buy klonopin online
Engines are organized as prescribed within their corresponding directories, although they’re not built nor do they have their own Git repository. They’re referenced directly from the containers Gemfile.buy xanax online
As database migrations trigger sweeping changes, the refactorings become simpler and you don’t need to worry about deploying updates to multiple applications/services as all your code is in one place, versioned together.
As important, each Engine or Gem has it’s own Gemfile, test_helper, test suite, and continuous integration environment. As mentioned in the first post, the unique Gemfile and test helper allows you to remove unnecessary dependencies while the individual test suite and continuous integration environment helps to avoid circular dependencies.